Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm on the side of 'confused' as well. With that much traffic, it shouldn't be hard to run a business with great revenues or massive passive profits.

But having visited this site for the first time, it looks like an old relic that's about 4 "generations" out of date. I am not enticed to click on anything.

They also clearly missed the boat on social media (10.3 million visitors and you have 3500 Facebook likes and 6000 Twitter followers?!), who knows what else was missed.

Does a site like this really need a large sales staff? As programmers, can't you program a better self-serve system and moderate it?

Content doesn't need to be that expensive. There are ways.

IMHO, this is the kind of site that a group of experienced web marketers could seriously turn around, keeping just a few excellent and aggressive young writers and editors on board.

But nah, giving up is easier. shakes head



this is the kind of site that a group of experienced web marketers could seriously turn around, keeping just a few excellent and aggressive young writers and editors on board.

You mean like The New Republic did? Sure they could probably have cut costs, changed their focus, become more mainstream (perhaps focused more on articles in list form) and remained profitable, but the end result wouldn't have been DDJ, but something else and just a shadow of its former self. Sometimes its best just quit while you still have a good thing going, rather than relentlessly running your brand into the ground, desperately chasing just one more dollar.


Yeah, want weDr.Dobbs needs is more flashiness and less quality content! Hell, it works for everyone else.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: