Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It may feel like it's safer, but personally, I doubt it. You're paying mostly for a feeling, and that's somewhat irrational.

Medicine is a relatively good place for paranoia though, and for feeling safe. Most brand loyalty is even sillier. Don't get me started about designer clothing.



> Most brand loyalty is even sillier.

This makes no sense to me. If I have a good experience with a company, then any subsequent experience is far more likely to be good than a random selection?

The entire point behind brands is consistent experience.


If we're being pedantic, that's inductive reasoning. See the problem of induction [1]; you cannot justify any inference about future experiences of a product based on past experiences of it alone.

Brand loyalty is broader and can potentially be justified.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_induction


Induction works mostly fine in practice.


It mostly doesn't result in catastrophe. That doesn't mean it produces optimal results.


I can't think of anything I where I don't pay for a feeling. I could live in a closet and eat the bare minimum to survive, but I like to feel cozy and feel that my food is tasty.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: