Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

GPT 5.2 Chat:

> There isn’t enough information to determine the inner diameter *for sure*.

All we’re told is: - The coaster has a diameter of 9. - The glass sits on the coaster. - The glass wall thickness is 1.

Nothing explicitly states that the *outer diameter of the glass equals the coaster’s diameter*. The glass could be smaller than the coaster, which is very common.

*However*, if we make the usual implicit assumption in this kind of problem—that the coaster’s diameter matches the *outer diameter of the glass base*—then:

- Outer diameter of glass = 9 - Wall thickness = 1 on each side

So: \[ \text{Inner diameter} = 9 - 2(1) = 7 \]

*Inner diameter = 7 (same units as the coaster)*

Without that assumption, the problem is underdetermined.



Opus 4.6 Extended thinking:

```

Finding the Inner Diameter The coaster sits beneath the glass on the table, meaning the glass rests on top of it. Assuming the coaster matches the outer diameter of the glass base:

Outer diameter of glass = diameter of coaster = 9 Wall thickness = 1 (on each side, so subtract twice)

dinner=9−2(1)=7d_{\text{inner}} = 9 - 2(1) = 7dinner =9−2(1)=7 The inner diameter of the glass is 7.

```

Makes its assumption clear, seems reasonable?


Assumptions need to be stated or you're solving only a discreet part of the problem! Try this, see if you get another deadpan assumption.

     A solar system has 3 planets in concentric orbit. PlanetZ is the farthest with an orbit diameter of 9. PlanetY has an obit diameter one greater than PlanetX. What is the orbit diameter of PlanetX?


I mean, the model is intended to help the user, not fight against the user trying to break it. IMO, it is reasonable for such model to default on making assumptions and going forward as long as the assumptions are clearly stated.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: