So why did 26 people vote this up? There's almost no meat to it at all.
The actual meat, for me, is thinking about how one goal interferes with another. Not news, but examples are always welcome.
Thanks for answering my question even though I didn't ask it well.
Author's perceived deficiencies in language were actually deficiencies in author's knowledge of that language.
Humbleness, you proly need more of that.
So why did 26 people vote this up? There's almost no meat to it at all.