Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Not to get in the way of good snark or anything. But.. Apple isn't _requiring_ that everyone uses MacOS on their systems. But you have to bring your own engineering effort to actually make another OS run. And so far Asahi is the only effort that I'm aware of (there were alternatives in the very beginning, but they didn't even get to M2 right?)


Note that they said (emphasis mine):

> they're still so small that they must protect themselves by requiring that macs be used for publishing iPhone and iPad applications.

They're not talking about Apple's silicon as a target, but as a development platform.


> But you have to bring your own engineering effort to actually make another OS run.

I mean, that's usually how it works though. When IBM launched the PS/2, they didn't support anything other than PC-DOS and OS/2, Microsoft had to make MS-DOS work for it (I mean... they did get support from IBM, but not really), the 386BSD and Linux communities brought the engineering effort without IBM's involvement.

When Apple was making Motorola Macs, they may have given Be a little help, but didn't support any other OSes that appeared. Same with PowerPC.

All of the support for alternative OSes has always come from the community, whether that's volunteers or a commercial interest with cash to burn. Why should that change for Apple silicon?


When Apple was making Motorola Macs, they may have given Be a little help, but didn't support any other OSes that appeared. Same with PowerPC.

Apple briefly supported a Linux distribution on PowerPC Macs: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MkLinux.


However to be more accurate that is from a time and age, where how management was going, maybe there wouldn't be an Apple today.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: