Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

And you'll notice that he successfully plants his left foot, but momentum just carries him ahead and into the fall and roll. And this is a best case scenario.

"The deaths came as a result of head trauma, with at least three of the accidents happening with the rider in a helmet."



Where are you getting that quote? The article seems to contradict that:

"Alongside the US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), the company now seeks to remedy the products after four known death cases — three without a helmet — between 2019 and 2021."


I was confused too. The only google result for that quote besides that comment is the following article: https://popculture.com/trending/news/onewheel-self-balancing...


They retroactively changed the article, that's where I got the quote from


You probably need a motorcycle helmet to stand a chance


I see someone riding one of these around my neighborhood in what is essentially full motorcycle gear: - full helmet with closed visor - armored jacket with elbow pads - knee pads - all high vis

Still doesn’t look like it’s enough while they cross a street in front of turning cars.


Motocross, even. Chin protection isn’t a focus of standard motorcycle helmets.


It is a standard feature of an ECE, FIM or even Snell rated helmet. Even modular helmets have the same chinbar testing as full face helmets.

I can't speak for DOT helmets, since that standard is untrustable for a variety of reasons anyway.


Someone deacronymize plz :(


All various motorcycle helmet standards. ECE is the EU standard, DOT is the US Department of Transportation standard, FIM is another, stricter EU standard (Functional Independence Measure), and Snell is not an acronym but is an independent safety testing organization.


FIM is Federation Internationale de Motorcyclisme - here referring to their standard for MotoGP and World Superbike helmets.

ECE is a United Nations standard that the EU has chosen to require for helmets sold in the EU.


Ah, thanks! Admittedly I Googled that one, it didn't feel right...


Also when I was buying my motorcycle gear (8 years ago) the general conses I recall is that ECE ~= DOT. Not sure what OP means regarding DOT certification.


DOT:

- is nearly 50 years old without meaningful changes to reflect half a century of head injury and brain injury research

- has significantly lower standards for how much force can be transmitted through the helmet to your skull - well within values that commonly cause skull fracture

- does not have any brain injury criteria for rotational trauma

- does not have any independent random testing, and limited independent random test studies have found 50% of labeled helmets don't meet the standard

The last point is especially frightening! ECE has fixed all of these issues. Fortnine's videos on this (and the problems with Snell 2020R/2020D) are a great place to learn more.


ECE is stricter than DOT, although it has a couple of shortcomings.

It sounds like upthread the poster thought that ECE doesn't allow half or 3/4 helmets, but they do.


He hopefully wasn't expecting to stop himself like that, that looks painful, it's asking for a sprain! But what a nice roll, does the fellow practice judo?


He does!

Actually, Adam recently achieved the scared third-degree black belt, which makes him a master of Suk-Hyeon-Deisu




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: