I was thinking the same thing. If the author's goal was simplicity, it seems like a strange choice to forgo using an existing SSG only to build a bespoke one on their own.
A PHP site (for the includes), or an out-of-the-box SSG would make much more sense, IMO.
A PHP site (for the includes), or an out-of-the-box SSG would make much more sense, IMO.