Hypervisor support on Windows is extremely expensive for Microsoft to maintain. Would Microsoft have a judgement against them if they removed it from e.g. Windows 12?
Before hyper-v there was Virtualbox, which is a "you can build it if you spend your time building it". I'm asking if the situation is that Apple must build their hyper-v equivalent, or if they just need to allow third parties to build and publish software-based emulation engines.
Before hyper-v there was Virtualbox, which is a "you can build it if you spend your time building it". I'm asking if the situation is that Apple must build their hyper-v equivalent, or if they just need to allow third parties to build and publish software-based emulation engines.