Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Playing devil's advocate: a fiber+power cable makes some sense. The main thing which limits the cable length is the data wires, not the power wires (just notice how one of the main counter-arguments for "one USB cable to rule them all" is "the higher bandwidth passive USB cables have to be shorter and thicker").


Fiber is far too fragile to deal with the abuse even babied USB cables put up with, unless you mandate some kind of semi-articulating steel conduit anyway.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dy312cUHumk&t=288s

Fiber can be very durable.

Once you get past the sticker shock of the transceivers.


We can just make them thicker so abusive bending is not easy to do.


So do it? Steel is cheap and recyclable.


It's also heavy and won't be recycled till we can landfill mine.

Now your short cables need heavy steel and fiber just to make long cables possible. Or else you have to have fiber+high speed copper in one connector.


> won't be recycled

Fine the shit out of people who don't recycle. Anything's possible if we put our minds to it.


Considering recycling is stupidly uneconomic for all but a tiny selection of materials and just makes the whole carbon issue even worse, why would we do that?

Hell, for plastic throwing it in a landfill is only second best to never making it in the first place.


First you have to make it practical to recycle at all. We don't even have recycling for bottles and cans here.


I'd probably guess it's too expensive? IIRC the original Thunderbolt spec was a fiber standard and they moved it to copper because people wanted to power stuff and adding copper cabling for power + power negotiation was infeasible cost wise so they ended up with a copper only cabling solution instead.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: