Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> and 6 because Dr. Meyerowitz-Katz was suspicious of them.”

That's a bit frightening, of course someone would be suspicious if results were going against his/her opinions



> I asked him about his decision-making, and he listed a combination of serious statistical errors and small red flags adding up. I was pretty uncomfortable with most of these studies myself, so I will err on the side of severity, and remove all studies that either I or Dr. Meyerowitz-Katz disliked

From further up, though we don't _quite_ know the details, but it's not like he went "Oh well some random person disagrees with them so better throw them out"


He also details the specifics that are wrong (or alleged to be wrong by Meyerowitz-Katz) with each paper in the post




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: