Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Universal mail delivery isn't just about helping the poor and needy. It's also about allowing the government to deliver services efficiently.

The government has an obligation to send every citizen voter registration cards, census forms, driving licenses, tax forms, firearms registration forms, passports and so on.

The alternatives - an IRS office in every backwater town, denying a vote to people living in remote areas, ATF agents delivering gun permits in person, denying driving licenses to people without a home internet connection - would either be more expensive, or less constitutional.

Unless UPS or FedEx wanted to take on a universal service obligation, of course...



>The alternatives - an IRS office in every backwater town, denying a vote to people living in remote areas, ATF agents delivering gun permits in person, denying driving licenses to people without a home internet connection - would either be more expensive, or less constitutional.

That's not the alternative. The alternative is that they pay a private delivery company to deliver it and/or the recipient will have to come to town to pick it up.


Plus using email more.


The German government manages to send those forms out just fine, despite them privatising Deutsche Post and eventually abolishing their letter monopoly.


Deutsche Post has flat-rate pricing within Germany - unlike your proposal that mail to and from remote locations should cost more. So I'm not sure how that example supports your argument?


My proposal is that companies should be allowed to charge different amounts. Not that they should.

What pricing scheme they want to use is up to them to decide.


What they decide is to not service large areas of the country. This also happens with internet service. Without government enforced rate setting and subsidies, rural areas would have very expensive roads, water, electricity, and phone service - even unaffordable.


It sounds like a good thing to expose people to the costs of their decisions?

Otherwise you just subsidise sprawl. That's bad for the climate as well (because of higher CO2 emissions).


Deutsche Post / DHL service quality has absolutely declined as a result of this and keeps getting worse so I don't know what argument you are trying to make.


Same in Sweden with Postnord.


Do you have any statistics on this?


You could procure the government postal service to a private contractor at the start of each presidential election, for the entirety of that presidential term /s


Actually outsourcing the universal coverage requirement to the lowest bidder might be a good idea.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: