Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This could be wrong, I am not a biological scientist.

I suspect in practice this is a non-issue, a kind of fake argument we like to make because it sounds right.

I think genetic improvements don't give massive improvements in a single healthy individual, that kind of technology is science fiction and would require many iterations of experimental use over many generations. So boosts of +20 or +200 IQ points or +20 or +200 attractiveness points is off the table.

What we have the power to do is reduce incident of genetic disease and very modestly improve outcomes for more healthy functioning brains.

This levels the playing field between the rich and poor because the rich hit the optimum for genetic improvement very fast (having already a lion's share of genetic advantages to start with), then they must experience diminishing returns for their money. It is likely that most common genetic improvements are also the most widely spread about in the population, the opposite of your vision.

Now having foolishly stuck my neck out I shall ask Gwern whether I am full of it. ;-)



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: